Mobile Phone Forums
Welcome to the Mobile Phone Forums

Go Back   Mobile Phone Forums > Mobile Phones > Networks
Register FAQ Mark Forums Read

Networks Discuss mobile phone service providers - Vodafone, Orange, T Mobile, O2, Three, Virgin Mobile etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 26-04-2006, 12:00 AM
Hannah Hannah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 74
Hannah is on a distinguished road
UK networks vs. US networks.

We've seen debates over which US and which UK provider is better, but has anyone here used networks in both countries? If so, do UK providers have a better overall service than US ones?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26-04-2006, 2:09 AM
econwriter5 econwriter5 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 34
econwriter5 is on a distinguished road
Don't providers have affiliates in other countries? I know when I went to Europe, every time I changed countries the carrier (I think) changed. I got a new welcome message from the local one when I went ti France, UK and Ireland.

I think networks, in general, in both countries, could benefit from further development but I think the UK is on a better track.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26-04-2006, 8:13 AM
vicki2 vicki2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 100
vicki2 is on a distinguished road
As an Amercan transplant to the U.K., I think the service here is far better especially when it comes to signal rate. There are major corridors of the U.S. which have virtually no service. There a huge area between New York City and Boston where it's almost impossible to get a signal. People there have not accepted the cell towers (hidden as they are) and environmentalists fight every plan to put one up.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27-04-2006, 2:17 AM
Hannah Hannah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 74
Hannah is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by vicki2
As an Amercan transplant to the U.K., I think the service here is far better especially when it comes to signal rate. There are major corridors of the U.S. which have virtually no service. There a huge area between New York City and Boston where it's almost impossible to get a signal. People there have not accepted the cell towers (hidden as they are) and environmentalists fight every plan to put one up.
Oh wow, of all places I thought the big cities like New York and Boston would have complete coverage. I'm not from a huge city, so I didn't know this was the case. Strange though. Thanks for your inputs guys.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27-04-2006, 3:03 AM
econwriter5 econwriter5 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 34
econwriter5 is on a distinguished road
No, not all cities have complete coverage. There are "dead zones" all over Chicago. You can be riding the "L" in the middle of a conversation, train stops and the line goes dead. There are parts in my neighborhood with no service as well.

And I agree with vicki2 that there are gigantic gaps in service. Just look at the coverage maps of carriers, and there will be noticable pockets all across the country.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27-04-2006, 7:39 AM
vicki2 vicki2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 100
vicki2 is on a distinguished road
Speaking of the gaps, who do you blame? Environmentalists or cell providers for not being more adaptable for scenic areas???
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2015 PhoneForums.org